In the paper presented the author deals with the complex of questions arisen by phenomenon of death. It shows that in his I Epistle to the Corinthians (especially chapter 15) St Paul dealt with fundamental question of the possibility of transcending the death and thus answered on one basic attitude of Heidegger’s Dasein Analysis. According to the Heidegger, fundamental ontology can not preliminarily decide weather there is existence after the death, it can merely explore possibilities of human present existence. In his polemics on the meaning of the Christ’s resurrection for Christian faith, St Paul puts ultimate dilemma: the truthfulness and relevance of Christian faith stands or falls upon the truthfulness of the Christ’s resurrection. The basic difference between Heidegger and St Paul is in the paper given as the difference of ontological approaches – Heidegger represents one „ontology of subject“ and St Paul expresses Christian „ontology of Personhood“. Evident character of „mine“ death which is fundamental for Heidegger and which contains individuality of man’s being is in Christian Pauline ontology replaced by evident character of the meaningfulness of the relations which а man has with Christ and with others.